posted by
janetmiles at 07:24pm on 14/07/2012
Well, not definitions, precisely, but how does this sound to you?
Ethics: Doing this right keeps you from fucking up someone's life.
Etiquette: Doing this right keeps you from fucking up someone's day.
Ethics: Doing this right keeps you from fucking up someone's life.
Etiquette: Doing this right keeps you from fucking up someone's day.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
I see a Venn diagram. On can overlap the other by quite a bit.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(I'm being a bit contrary to some of the comments already posted - but they're right too, in a model-y sort of way, just as I'm certainly no more than right in a model-y sort of way.)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Personally, I'd say that discarding ethics may fuck up someone's day / life / whatever whereas discarding etiquette only makes you look like a bit of a prick.
Then again, I live in the UK and nuances may be different here...
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Are you working backward from the amount of harm caused and using that to determine whether something was ethics or etiquette?
I tried that briefly, and ran into obvious moral contradictions. I thought Janet was trying to frame the distinction in order to determine whether something was ethics or etiquette. (The question can be before or after the action.) People are upset about something a guy did--did the guy do something unethical, or was it an etiquette violation? It's a worthwhile question. I don't think the answer aligns with how much harm was done, so I find it misleading to define the terms as the original post does.
(no subject)
(no subject)